International Journal of Hematology

DOI: 10.1007/s12185-017-2271-8 Pages: 476-483

Comparisons of argatroban to lepirudin and bivalirudin in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1. Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Department of Pharmacy

2. Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Department of Neurology

3. Dalian Medical University, Department of Pharmacology

Correspondence to:
Yalin Xi
Tel: 0086-411-84412001



To prevent thromboembolic events associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), patients usually are treated with argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies to comparing the treatment of HIT with the following direct thrombin inhibitor: argatroban versus lepirudin and argatroban versus bivalirudin. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database for relevant studies. The clinical outcomes were thromboembolic complication and bleeding. A total of 589 articles were found and 9 of which were finally included in this meta-analysis. There were no significantly differences of thromboembolic complication between argatroban and hirudin analogues (lepirudin and bivalirudin) in the treatment of HIT (lepirudin: RR = 0.773, 95% CI = 0.449–1.331, P = 0.353; bivalirudin: RR = 0.768, 95% CI = 0.386–1.527, P = 0.452). Moreover, the incidence of clinical bleeding of argatroban was similar to hirudin analogues (lepirudin: RR = 0.755, 95% CI = 0.531–1.073, P = 0.117; bivalirudin: RR = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.673–1.472, P = 0.981). Current evidences show that argatroban has the similar effectiveness and safety with lepirudin and bivalirudin for defending against HIT.

To access the full text, please Sign in

If you have institutional access, please click here

Share the Knowledge